Consumer AI · Learning · Habit

AI adoption is a skills problem, and nobody is solving it daily.

Prompty is Duolingo for AI. Five-minute challenges, scored feedback on real prompts, XP, streaks, and a mascot that grows — turning a tool people own into a skill they use.

See the round
1.2B
People with AI access
<10%
Use it beyond basic Q&A
$X.XB
Consumer learning spend
Pre-seed
Stage
The problem

Distribution is solved. Competence isn't.

Every major platform now ships an AI assistant. The bottleneck moved from access to ability — and the current answers to that gap don't stick.

Failure mode 01

Courses ask for hours

A 4-hour prompt engineering course converts a tiny slice of intent into completion. Most people never finish week one.

Failure mode 02

Prompt libraries teach nothing

Copy-paste packs solve one task and build zero skill. Users return to the blank box just as stuck.

Failure mode 03

Enterprise training doesn't transfer

Companies buy seats and run a one-time workshop. Usage flatlines by week three and the licenses churn.

The insight

Skill follows frequency. So build the habit first and teach second.

Duolingo didn't win by being the best language pedagogy — it won by being the thing you open at 11:58pm to save a streak. Prompty applies the same loop to the most valuable general-purpose skill of this decade, in a category where the "practice partner" is the AI itself. That makes the feedback instant, personalized, and nearly free to deliver.

The product

A five-minute loop that pays out every day.

Users get a real task, write their own prompt, and receive a scored critique plus the stronger version. XP, badges, streaks, and a mascot that evolves at day 7, 30, and 100 carry them to tomorrow.

Open the product site
Retention engine

Streaks, XP, and an evolving mascot

The mascot is the text cursor itself — the thing users used to stare at. Progression is visible, personal, and costly to abandon.

Content engine

Challenges generated and graded by AI

Marginal cost per lesson approaches zero, so the library scales with usage instead of headcount. Human review sets quality bars per track.

Data advantage

A corpus of real user prompts and revisions

Every attempt is a labeled before/after. Over time that dataset tunes grading, personalizes difficulty, and is not easily replicated.

Business model

Free habit, paid depth, and a B2B wedge behind it.

Consumer freemium drives volume and word of mouth. Teams and institutions pay for the same loop with reporting attached — the piece every employer buying AI seats currently lacks.

Free
$0

One challenge a day, streaks, XP, mascot to Spark. The acquisition and habit layer.

Prompty Plus
$8.99/mo

Unlimited challenges, all skill tracks, prompt history review, streak repair, advanced grading.

Teams & education
$X/seat

Cohort dashboards, assigned tracks, completion reporting. Sold to employers and institutions already paying for AI licenses they can't measure.

Why now

The window is open and it isn't wide.

Three curves crossed at once. First mover on the daily habit takes the category name.

01

Access went mainstream

AI is bundled into phones, browsers, and office suites. The addressable user is now everyone, not early adopters.

02

Grading got cheap and good

Model quality is finally high enough to critique a prompt usefully at a cost per session measured in fractions of a cent.

03

Employers started measuring

Budget holders are asking what their AI spend produced. That question has no product answer today.

Traction & roadmap

What's built, what's next.

Replace the placeholder figures below with current numbers before sending this to anyone.

NOW

Working prototype and brand

Prototype live, waitlist at [X] signups, [X] challenges written across [X] tracks.

NEXT 90 DAYS

Closed beta and the retention read

Ship iOS and web beta to [X] users. Target metric: D7 retention and average streak length, benchmarked against consumer learning norms.

6 MONTHS

Monetization on

Launch Prompty Plus, test price points, and run [X] paid team pilots to validate the B2B wedge.

12 MONTHS

Institutional motion

Convert pilots into contracts with employers and higher-ed programs, and open the seed round on retention plus revenue.

Competitive position

Everyone teaches AI. Nobody owns the daily loop.

Courses own intent, not attention. Prompt libraries own tasks, not skill. Model makers own the tool and have no incentive to build a third-party habit layer across all of them.

Moat 01

Habit is the defensibility

A 90-day streak is switching cost that no feature clone recovers.

Moat 02

Model-agnostic by design

Prompty teaches skills that transfer across every assistant, so platform shifts help rather than threaten.

Moat 03

Brand and mascot

Category-defining mascots compound. Duolingo's owl is worth more than its curriculum.

The ask

Raising $[X] to prove the loop retains.

The single question that matters at this stage is whether people come back on day seven. This round funds getting to a clean answer.

[X]%Product & engineering — beta on iOS and web
[X]%Content — challenge library across all six tracks
[X]%Growth — paid tests and creator partnerships
Request the deck

Dashed figures throughout this page are placeholders. Swap in real numbers, or delete the metric, before sharing.